Ankle blood press (BP) measure is crucial for the diagnosis that hypertension where dimensions are not possible due come medical problems or limb deformities. Based upon a recent review the the evidence, we recommend an ankle BP threshold that ≥155/90 mmHg to define high blood push in patients who do not have vascular disease. We recommend that ankle BP readings are taken through the subject lying down, using a validated automated device with the cuff placed around the ankle/lower calf.

You are watching: Can you take blood pressure on leg

Blood press (BP) is normally measured on the top arm, but occasionally this is not possible. The existence of fractures, wounds, vascular accessibility devices and also shunts, morbid obesity, operation procedures, lymphoedema, body deformities (phocomelia) and also amputations might prevent the satisfactory cuff placement roughly the upper arm. In addition, BP measurement may be inaccurate in the presence of bilateral subclavian artery stenoses such together can take place with Takayasu’s arteritis <1> or atherosclerosis <2>. In these circumstances, measure up of BP in the leg may be necessary. The is important to recognise, however, the BP measurements in the arm may differ native those in the legs.

A current systematic review examined the relationship between supine BP measurements in the arm and also leg <3>. A evaluation of 44 studies entailing 9771 patients concluded the ankle systolic BP to be on typical 17.0 mmHg (95% CI 15.4–21.3 mmHg) greater than arm systolic BP, whilst there to be no difference in diastolic BP in the general population <3>. This findings imply that a threshold of ≥155/90 mmHg could be provided for diagnosing hypertension in regime practice as soon as only ankle dimensions are available. This threshold is conservative and also would certain maximum sensitivity come detect hypertension at the price of some specificity.

It must be listed that the review discovered much lower leg pressure in the presence of peripheral vascular an illness (PVD). The suggest threshold should because of this be offered with caution, and also patients with low ankle BPs in the presence of cardiovascular risk components (e.g. Diabetes, renal condition and currently cardiovascular disease) should be considered for further investigation, particularly if there is a background of intermittent claudication or clinical proof of PVD (e.g. Femoral arterial bruits, negative or lacking foot pulses, negative distal skin perfusion, cold peripheries or arterial ulceration). In such cases, arterial Doppler ultrasonography, CT or grandfather angiography deserve to be provided to confirm significant PVD which may invalidate the usage of fishing eye BP as a surrogate for eight BP. PVD may be worse in one leg compared with the other, for this reason ankle BPs need to be take away in both legs whereby this is suspected.

The review uncovered no continuous or accepted method for measure BP in the leg. We thus propose that ankle BP is measured in a supine position, making use of a cuff placed roughly the ankle/lower calf (Fig. 1), ensuring the bladder encircles ≥80% the the fishing eye circumference. Readings need to be taken either by oscillometry or Doppler readings of return to flow at the dorsalis pedis or posterior tibial arteries (systolic readings only). Auscultation is not feasible in most subjects and is not therefore recommended. Fishing eye BPs space recommended fairly than calf or thigh measurements due to the fact that they generally cause less discomfort and also the cuff is simpler to fit, an especially in obese patients. As with standard clinic BP measurement, readings need to be taken after a 5-min rest duration <4>. In terms of oscillometric BP monitors, these have not been specifically validated because that leg measurements yet are widely offered in clinical practice and are a reasonable choice. That is important to note that the use of ambulatory readings for diagnosis will certainly not be possible in patients requiring foot BP measurements. However, where out-of-office measurements are required, home ankle BP monitoring could be thought about after appropriate training.


Image taken native Wiki just how to take it an fishing eye Brachial table of contents (

Ankle BP measurement represents a viable different to arm measurement for the diagnosis of hypertension, whereby placement the a cuff on the top arm is no possible. A threshold of ≥155/90 mmHg can be recommended, yet physicians need to use it through caution, recognising the ankle BP measurements might differ substantially in patients v PVD. Provided the impracticalities of taking ambulatory dimensions in the ankle, we recommend the diagnosis is confirmed and also treatment initiated only complying with consistently high fish eye BP readings from repetitive clinic visits.


JS receives funding from the Wellcome Trust/Royal society via a sir Henry Dale Fellowship (ref: 211182/Z/18/Z). He additionally receives funding from the NIHR college for Primary care Research and also the NIHR collaboration for leadership in applied Health Research and also Care Oxford at Oxford health NHS foundation Trust. PSL receives funding from the NIHR better Manchester CRN.

Blood push Measurement working Party of the British and also Irish Hypertension Society

N. Chapman5, P. Chowienczyk6, C. Clark7, S. McDonagh7, E. Denver8, R. McManus9, A. Neary10


Nuffield department of Primary care Health Sciences, university of Oxford, Oxford, UK

James P. Sheppard

Population scientific research & speculative Medicine, academy of Cardiovascular Science, college College London, London, UK

Peter Lacy

Stockport NHS foundation Trust, Stockport and also University the Manchester, Manchester, UK

Philip S. Lewis

School the Pharmacy, university of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK

Una Martin

Imperial university London, London, UK

N. Chapman

King’s college London, London, UK

P. Chowienczyk

University that Exeter, Exeter, UK

C. Clark & S. McDonagh

Whittington health and wellness NHS Trust, London, UK

E. Denver

University that Oxford, Oxford, UK

R. McManus

Galway Clinic, Galway, Ireland

A. Neary

on instead of of the Blood press Measurement functioning Party the the British and also Irish Hypertension Society

N. Chapman, P. Chowienczyk, C. Clark, S. McDonagh, E. Denver, R. McManus & A. Neary

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have actually no problem of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note Springer continues to be neutral with regard come jurisdictional insurance claims in released maps and also institutional affiliations.

See more: Best Scratch Off Tickets In Ga Lottery Scratch Offs, Top Prizes Claimed

Members that the Blood pressure Measurement functioning Party that the British and also Irish Hypertension society are provided below Acknowledgements.

Reprints and Permissions


Cite this article

Sheppard, J.P., Lacy, P., Lewis, P.S. Et al. Measurement of blood push in the leg—a explain on behalf of the British and also Irish Hypertension Society. J Hum Hypertens 34, 418–419 (2020). Https://

Download citation

Received: 17 April 2019

Revised: 05 February 2020

Accepted: 28 February 2020

Published: 22 April 2020

Issue Date: June 2020

Share this article

Anyone girlfriend share the following link with will have the ability to read this content: