*
St. Man Nepomucene Catholic Church is seen on a new York City street in this might 2, 2019, photo. The church was named for the 14th-century Bohemian saint, thought about the an initial martyr the the seal the confession. (CNS photo/Chaz Muth)

The Catholic Church is campaigning against California’s proposed transforms to the mandatory son abuse reporting legislation that might compromise the old Catholic defense the the “seal that the confessional.” Currently, clergy members are mandated reporters of boy abuse and also neglect, however need not report abuse if their reasonable suspicions are based upon “penitential communications.” number of bills have actually been proposed that would remove or limit this report exception.

You are watching: Can priests report confessions to the police

The variation of SB 360 happen by the California Senate and scheduled for a July 9 hearing before the Assembly’s Public safety and security committee narrows the meaning of penitential communications to those comparable to the Sacrament of Reconciliation, in that they should be “made in the manner and also context that areas the clergy member specifically and also strictly under a level that confidentiality that is thought about inviolate by church doctrine.” The bill, if enacted, would also require reporting of child abuse revealed through “penitential communications between a priest member and another person that is employed at the exact same site or facility as the priest member” and also “between a clergy member and another priest member.”

This change is significant, yet SB 360 walk not apply to many confessions and, as at this time written, would not readjust California’s proof Code, which retains the priest-penitent privilege and also grants anyone the appropriate “to prevent another from discover a penitential communication.” The laws of other states are much more severe and less religiously accommodating, although handy considerations have minimal their influence on spiritual adherents.

The Catholic Church is currently campaigning versus California’s proposed changes to that mandatory kid abuse report law.

A close look at brand-new Hampshire regulation demonstrates the complexities of using evidentiary rules—which apply to courtroom or governmental hearing testimony—and mandated reporting regulations that are universally applicable come real world situations. New Hampshire’s court procedure legislation uses one expansive definition of spiritual privilege that, ~ above its face, protects the secrecy of every confidential interactions made to spirituality advisors.

Nevertheless, the state’s Child security Act mandates that any kind of person, including a “priest, minister, or rabbi” need to report suspected child abuse and neglect to the suitable government agency. The only exemption to global reporting is the attorney-client privilege. All various other “professional” privileges, including the priest-penitent privilege, room not honored as soon as it pertains to the state’s mandatory child abuse reporting requirements.

In 1997, a bill to delete “priests, ministers, and rabbis from the mandated report provisions” and provide protection “for privileged communications between such clergy and individuals confiding in them in their skilled capacity” never ever made it the end of committee and was no passed by the legislature. Thus, in new Hampshire, one regulation prohibits a priest from testifying against a penitent in court, but one more requires a priest who learns of kid abuse in the confessional come report details of that abuse, including the surname of the alleged abuser, come the state’s department of Health and Human Services. A priest’s duties under the new Hampshire law appears clear, however its application has been inconsistent.

 

In 2002, after countless Catholic priests were accused of raping and also abusing children and church officials were accused of spanning up this crimes, the Catholic Diocese of Manchester signed a non-prosecution commitment with the new Hampshire attorney General. Return the covenant requires every priests, ministers, employees and volunteers come “comply v the mandatory report obligations, the state did no object come a diocesan reporting policy that confirms the inviolability of the confessional.

The disparity between the statutory provisions and also the attorney General’s acquiescence to the church’s priest-penitent exemption is not explained. The legislature has actually not straight approved or disapproved this interpretation, but, in 2006, the failed to act top top a bill that would have actually amended the state’s court procedure law to clarification “that spiritual leaders space not exempt from child abuse report requirements.”

The new Hampshire can be fried Court has actually spoken, however. In State v. Willis (2013), a prosecution including incriminating explanation made come a Baptist minister, the court did not identify a special security for confessional communications.

North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas and also West Virginia every deny religious exemptions from their son abuse report laws.

“Whether a communication is a ‘confidence’ in ~ the definition of the religious privilege relies upon the objectively reasonable expectation of the communicant, under the totality that the circumstances,” the court held. “Because our law gives that any statement to a clergyperson that could be valuable in developing child abuse is not safeguarded by the privilege, a communicant cannot have actually an objectively reasonable expectation the such a declare will continue to be confidential.” The minister in the Willis case voluntarily reported the abuse to police, so the court did not show what penalty, if any, would apply to a member of the priest who retained a confession of child rape or abuse secret.

New Hampshire’s statute renders it a misdemeanor to “knowingly” hurt the report law, however the circumstances once a failure to report abuse disclosed in the confessional would become known to legislation enforcement authorities are limited.

North Carolina, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas and also West Virginia every deny religious exemptions indigenous their kid abuse report laws. North Carolina’s mandatory report law uses to everyone in the state and also unequivocally needs disclosure that traditionally privileged communications, v a small attorney-client exception. West Virginia’s regulation is similar.

Several states have laws that are silent on the applicability of the priest-penitent privilege to child abuse report laws.

Rhode Island and also Tennessee particularly preclude relying on any kind of privilege various other than attorney-client confidentiality to justify a failure to report or refusal to testify in boy abuse proceedings. Oklahoma and also Texas have eliminated even the attorney-client privilege from your mandated reporting and Texas has got rid of all however the attorney-client privilege from boy abuse prosecutions. There room no report judicial decisions in any kind of of these says relating to a clergy human being who has refused to testify versus a penitent, yet in Tennessee and also Texas, ministers have actually been permitted to voluntarily give evidence against congregants that made confidential disclosures of son abuse.

Indiana’s “clergymen” privilege regulation is prefaced v qualifying language, “xcept as otherwise detailed by statute,” which, on its face, makes it subservient come the state’s universally applicable kid abuse report law.

Several states have actually laws that space silent top top the applicability the the priest-penitent privilege to child abuse report laws. Connecticut’s list of mandated reporters law contains “any member the the clergy,” but it does not mention whether that law supersedes its wide priest-penitent evidentiary privilege.

According come a 1994 legislature analysis, “There might or might not it is in a conflict in between the confidentiality and also reporting statutes, depending on . There is, however, a conflict in between the report requirement and also the general philosophical principle of confidentiality for statements made to clergymen.”

Mississippi’s legislations are an in similar way ambiguous, yet in a 2005 clergy sex abuse instance (later settled for 5.1 million dollars), the Mississippi can be fried Court upheld a insurance claim of priest-penitent privilege brought against disclosure of “letters seeking spiritual guidance or intercessory prayer.”

Although the thought of break the seal that the confessional is abhorrent come Catholics, it might be constitution under the controlling Supreme Court case, Employment department v. Smith.

The court did not dominion on even if it is church officials violated the state’s mandatory reporting law. The Nebraska rules of proof prevent disclosure of confidential interactions made to a clergy person in a experienced capacity “at all stages of every actions, cases, and also proceedings.” The state’s kid abuse report law applies to everyone in the state and does not point out exemptions for religious confidences.

See more: Can Trump Drop Out Of Race, Rough Polling Stretch Has Gop Operatives Asking

Although the assumed of break the seal the the confessional is abhorrent to Catholics (and grounds because that excommunication in Catholic canon law), it may be constitution under the managing Supreme Court case, Employment division v. Blacksmith (1990). As Justice Antonin Scalia’s majority opinion states, “The best of totally free exercise does not relieve an separation, personal, instance of the duty to comply with a ‘valid and neutral regulation of general applicability ~ above the ground that the law proscribes (or prescribes) conduct that his faith prescribes (or proscribes).’”

The only exceptions are once a spiritual right is supported by secondary constitutional protection, such as freedom of decided or of the press. Adversaries of mandatory reporting needs that infringe ~ above the penitential privilege might argue the the legislations are similar to the compelled speech claimed unconstitutional in national Institute of Family and also Life advocates v. Becerra (2018), which used a narrowly tailored/compelling attention test come strike under California’s mandatory notice requirements because that licensed crisis pregnancy centers.