The intended impeachment proceedings on Wednesday against President Donald J. Trump will certainly surface one of the Constitution’s most arcane questions: deserve to a federal official be eliminated from office if he’s currently left the building?

To date, that question has actually not been answered fully, however it to be presented to the founders in early 1799, about 11 years after the constitution Convention in Philadelphia. The home of representatives impeached Senator wilhelm Blount and sent impeachment articles to the Senate after Blount was already expelled from office. However, Blount’s complete trial was never hosted in the Senate. Also, the facts in the Blount case were very different than those most likely presented in chairman Trump’s 2nd impeachment process.

You are watching: Can a president be impeached and stay in office

Link:The second Trump Impeachment: What wake up Next?

William Blount was himself a Founder. He stood for North Carolina in ~ the 1787 convention yet said small at the proceedings when he was in Philadelphia. Blount was one of 39 delegates who signed the Constitution, and also he also promoted its ratification in phibìc Carolina.

By 1797, Blount obtained land west that the Mississippi top top credit and was in significant debt. ~ France defeated Spain in the battle of the Pyrenees, in order to avoid Spain from ceding France that territories and also potentially depressing west land prices further, Blount became associated in a setup for indigenous Americans and also frontiersmen to attack parts of contemporary Missouri and Louisiana, which would ultimately then be transferred to an excellent Britain.

Video:Jeffrey Rosen and Ali Velshi on even if it is a previous President can Be Impeached

However, a letter incriminating Blountfell right into the hand of Secretary that State Timothy Pickering. President man Adams, top top receiving the letter, sent it come Congress. Blount came to be the first federal federal government official subject to the impeachment process, among the Constitution’s vital checks-and-balances versus the abuse that power.

The Constitution’s post II, section 4 reads the “the President, angry President and also all Civil policemans of the joined States, shall be gotten rid of from Office top top Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other high Crimes and Misdemeanors.” The constitution assigns the factor to consider of charges come the home of Representatives, v the Senate conducting a attempt if the house approves impeachment articles against a civil officer.

On July 8, 1787, an outraged Senate voted to expel Blount from its membership, in accordance with its strength under short article I, section 5, the Expulsion Clause, which gives that “Each residence may identify the rules of its Proceedings, punishment its Members because that disorderly Behaviour, and, with the Concurrence of two thirds, expel a Member.” but the House had actually impeached Blount a job earlier and the Senate was obliged to shot Blount when the final impeachment articles were gift to it.

By December 17, 1798, Blount had actually returned to Tennessee and had no to plan to to visit Senate impeachment proceedings that day. Still, the Senate trial procedure went forward.

The Senate challenged two questions: First, to be a senator taken into consideration a “civil officer” under the impeachment clause, and second, if the was, can a civil officer the end of office face trial and also conviction in the Senate?

Jared Ingersoll, a signer of the Constitution, was one of the attorneys representing Blount in ~ the trial. Ingersoll said a city council was no a “civil officer” subject to impeachment, uneven the President and other officials. Representative James A. Bayard of Delaware, the House’s command manager, replied that the considerations because that the Northwest Ordinance the 1787 and the Constitution’s plain language made the clear the senators were civil officers subject to impeachment.

Rep. Bayard and also Alexander James Dallas, Blount’s other attorney, debated that secondary question. Bayard believed a polite officer can not escape impeachment v resignation. “The party, through resignation or the the supervisory board of some offense i m sorry merited and also occasioned his expulsion, might secure his impunity. This is versus one the the sagest maxims of the law, which go not permit a guy to derive a advantage from his own wrong.”

Dallas conceded the argument, but then stated Blount had actually been expelled by the Senate, which was a different matter. “I certainly shall never complete that one officer may first commit an violation and later on avoid penalty by resigning his office; but the defendant has actually been expelled. Have the right to he be eliminated at one trial and disqualified at an additional for the very same offense?”

In the end, the Senate voted 14 come 11 top top January 11, 1799, come dismiss a motion that “William Blount was a civil officer the the United says within the definition of the Constitution.” It then passed another resolution by a poll of 14–11: “The court is the opinion the the issue alleged in the plea that the defendant is adequate in law to present that this court ought no to organize jurisdiction the the stated impeachment, and that the stated impeachment is dismissed.” numerous scholars check out this as proof a senator can not be impeached, and expulsion through a two-thirds vote is rather the ideal remedy, however that was not conclusively declared by the Senate.

In president Trump’s probable 2nd impeachment, existing Senate bulk leader Mitch McConnell has issued guidance the a trial, if needed, can still take location after the inauguration when Trump to be no much longer president.

It is an open up question regarding whether a previous president can challenge a Senate impeachment trial. In a recent article on the legitimate blog just Security, UNC legislation professor Michael J. Gerhardt points the end one argument versus the trial of a former president — the Donald J. Trump card would come to be a private citizen after leaving office and the structure only applies to civil officers. Gerhardt additionally acknowledges the counterpoint: “The difficulty with this argument, however, is the presidents and the other officials who room subject come impeachment room not like the remainder of us. As soon as they leaving office and also return to their private lives, they room still ex-presidents and former officials that may have actually committed impeachable offenses in office,” Gerhardt writes, and “litigation or prosecutions might not have the ability to get at the misconduct, because the scope of impeachable offenses extends come misconduct that is not an really crime.”

In December 2019, the Washington article interviewed six scholars about that an extremely question. Three believed it to be a feasible but unsettled inquiry that a former president could confront a Senate trial; two others stated the Senate lacked such powers; and also one scholar thought the Senate could shot a previous president.

Scholar open minded O. Bowman additionally pointed out another precedent: the 1876 impeachment trial of william Belknap, who served as Secretary of war for president Ulysses S. Grant. Belknap confronted allegations that receiving kickbacks, and also he resigned moments prior to the home approved write-ups of impeachment. The house charged Belknap with “basely prostituting his high office to his lust for private gain.” at Belknap’s trial, the Senate passed a movement in a 37 come 29 vote the “William W. Belknap, the respondent, is amenable to trial by impeachment because that acts done together Secretary the War, notwithstanding his resignation of claimed office prior to he was impeached.” The Senate later acquitted Belknap on all charges, lacking a two-thirds bulk to convict.

See more: How To Block A Number On Verizon Wireless, Stop Unwanted & Annoying Home Phone Calls

A third criterion is the situation of commonwealth judge West Hughes Humphries. Humphries left the commonwealth bench in Tennessee to sign up with the Confederacy as a referee without resigning his federal commission. In January 1862, residence member john Bingham led the investigating committee, which fee Humphries v high crimes and also misdemeanors. The Senate found Humphries guilty on seven charges in June 1862, and in a different vote, a unanimous Senate disqualified Humphries from holding federal office again.