November 2014 Issue

Farewell come the 3,500-Calorie Rule By Densie Webb, PhD, RD Today"s Dietitian Vol. 26 No. 11 P. 36

Researchers have developed brand-new mathematical formulas RDs can use to an ext accurately predict the rate of load loss in patients.

You are watching: Calories needed to burn a pound

If you"ve counseled clients and also patients for weight loss, you understand that even the most diligent the dieters ultimately will reach a weight-loss steady state, a plateau, a stumbling block that can be frustrating for them and dietitians alike. And, unfortunately, a huge percentage the those that succeed at shedding weight will get it back over time.

We all know the weight-loss rules: eat much more calories 보다 you burn and also you"ll get weight; eat fewer calories 보다 you burn and also you"ll shed weight. However, researchers say it"s no that simple. In an effort to better understand the weight-loss process, researchers have actually devised one ingenious method to an ext accurately predict the trajectory of load loss for individuals via a mathematics formula. The expect is that utilizing it will an outcome in more realistic expectation for load loss with fewer disappointments follow me the way, and help explain when and why weight-loss plateaus occur, even among seemingly devoted dieters.

Also in development is a personalized dynamic feedback manage mechanism the clients can wear to monitor your progress and determine once it"s time because that reassessment with a dietitian. It"s also a technique for RDs to predict in advance who"s most likely to succeed at losing those excess pounds longterm.

Conventional Weight-Loss Wisdom Ask any kind of dietitian and also he or she most likely will say that cutting food entry by 3,500 calories results in a 1-lb loss. Reduced 500 calories per day and also that"s 1 lb every week. End the course of one year, that would certainly equal 52 lbs. That"s what RDs have been and also continue to be taught, and it"s promulgated by the us Surgeon General and also the Academy that Nutrition and Dietetics, and also it"s recurring in number of nutrition textbooks.

It"s been approximated that the 3,500-calorie dominion is cited in an ext than 35,000 educational weight-loss sites.1 In September, the Journal of the American medical Association released a patient handout title Healthy weight Loss, in i m sorry the first sentence states, "A complete of 3,500 calories equals 1 pound of human body fat. This way if girlfriend decrease (or increase) her intake by 500 calorie daily, you will lose (or gain) 1 pound per week."2 Undoubtedly, the 3,500-calorie dogma tho is being taught also though it"s been presented that it just doesn"t occupational this way. So whereby did the 3,500-calorie weight-loss wisdom come from? It originated from researcher Max Wishnofsky, MD, in 1958, that calculated that 1 lb of fat stores around 3,500 kcal of energy.3 It to be appealingly simple, and also it stuck.

"I think this happens frequently when there is a an easy rule the thumb," says Diana Thomas, PhD, manager of the center for Quantitative excessive weight Research at Montclair State University, and one the the researchers affiliated in developing the brand-new approaches. "It"s easy to propagate, and there"s resistance come adopting other that"s an ext complex."

The 3,500-calories-per-pound dominance seemed come make feeling at the time, yet much has occurred in the area of person nutrition in the last 55 years, consisting of the sharing of expertise amongst fields. The breakthrough in the expertise of how and also why weight loss occurs and predicting the price at which it does, is the result of experts in nutrition and mathematics putting their cumulative heads together, comes up with facility formulas and then simple them.

Elusive Weight-Loss Success The specialists Today"s Dietitian spoke with agree that while the 3,500-calories-per-pound preeminence does seem to work reasonably well in the quick term and for those who want to shed only a couple of pounds, the logic begins to loss apart over the long term, specifically for those make the efforts to shed a far-ranging amount the weight. Dietitians understand that as an individual loses weight, the body"s power requirements decrease, however the dynamic physiological adaptations that happen never have been quantified or figured into the 3,500-calorie rule.4 The many serious error the the 3,500-calorie rule is its fail to account for dynamic transforms in energy balance that occur throughout a dieting intervention.5 also not taken right into account: gender, the truth that eating and also exercise habits may adjust over time, and poor compliance, all of which can influence weight loss. Since of this, the professionals say, the 3,500-calorie-per-pound technique significantly overestimates exactly how much weight civilization will shed over time, setting them up for disappointment once weight lose slows or stops altogether.1 In other words, the body adapts and lifestyles change in myriad methods that minimization or even eradicate the impact of decreased calorie input and, until recently, there has actually been no way to predict just how consuming fewer calories may affect the rate of weight loss amongst individuals do the efforts to lose weight, specifically when the goal is to lose much more than just a couple of pounds.

The new complicated weight-loss formulas element in the drop in metabolic price that occurs in time as human body mass decreases. After applying the formulas to individuals, a main conclusion Thomas and other researchers have drawn isn"t a renowned one—that civilization generally plateau beforehand in the weight-loss process, not since of a metabolic slowdown, although the does occur, but due to the fact that they don"t adhere to calorie-reduced diet plans consistently long term.4,6

"If a plateau is got to within 6 months, climate in all likelihood, the person is no much longer strictly adhering come the diet," states Carson C. Chow, PhD, a an elderly investigator in the math biology section of the national Institutes of health and wellness (NIH). Six to ripe months is the common timeline because that dieters to with the dreaded plateau, but "given that body weight transforms so slowly, it might be extended out to a year," Chow says. The new formulas allow clinicians to see what realistically have the right to be expected based on the individual"s weight, age, gender, and physical activity, and close monitoring enables for adjustments in the predictive formula.7

Where specifically does exercise fit in? The result of physical activity on the rate of weight loss isn"t clear. However, research suggests that the small amount of load loss sometimes seen in exercise treatment studies isn"t as result of exercise"s lack of effect on load loss, but it"s a result of not getting sufficient exercise prescribed,6 and also that"s compounded by rise in calorie intake—in various other words, no sticking to the prescribed reduced-calorie diet lengthy term.1 The ratio of macronutents in the diet, especially the proportion of protein to carbohydrates and fat, has been endorsed together a means to promote load loss. However, little effect has actually been demonstrated in the short term.

Yet, follow to Kevin Hall, PhD, a an elderly investigator in the mathematics biology ar of the NIH, not enough is known around the long-term effects of varying macronutrient diet composition.4 together a result, the ratio of macronutrients in the diet isn"t consisted of in the new weight-loss forecast formulas.

New Weight-Loss mathematics To accessibility the programs and also apps for assessing the weight-loss trajectory the clients and patients, Hall and also colleagues at the NIH have developed the Body load Simulator, available at www.niddk.nih.gov/research-funding/at-niddk/labs-branches/LBM/integrative-physiology-section/body-weight-simulator/Pages/body-weight-simulator.aspx. At an initial glance, it might not look at that various from other weight-loss predictors, but a tremendous amount of mathematical calculations have entered its development. Plugin your client"s info (weight, height, activity level, goal weight, length of time to with goal) and also it will administer a calorie level for load loss and a calorie level because that maintenance. Thomas and her colleagues at Pennington Biomedical Research facility in Baton Rouge, Louisiana, also have emerged a single Subject Weight readjust Predictor application for predicting weight loss, which have the right to be uncovered at http://pbrc.edu/research-and-faculty/calculators/sswcp. Utilizing the Pennington digital calculator, a 200-lb man aged 35 who cut 500 kcal/day from his diet would certainly be intended to shed 23 lbs in one year vs 23 lbs in four months in accordance with the 3,500-calorie-per-pound rule.

Hall and also Thomas agree the while there are several minor differences in their models, the predictions space similar. The NIH calculator permits for much more detailed input around physical activity, and also the Pennington model enables users to to compare the freshly calculated bottom weight-loss trajectory, based on your input, with that of the 3,500-calorie-per-pound rule.

The new mathematical approaches have actually been validated repeatedly, researchers say. In fact, the 3,500-calorie tip was refuted in a agreement statement issued together by the American culture for Nutrition and the international Life scientific researches Institute in 2012,8 back the math approaches haven"t to be widely adopted for clinical weight administration or offered to educate policy discussions.4 Still, Hall has high wishes for the new weight-loss math.

"I think our methods might be provided to remotely monitor patients and also detect at an early stage signs of follow loss the would cause a counseling conference or a reevaluation of weight goals and the form of intervention," claims Hall, who has actually invented the personalized dynamic feedback control device, because that which the NIH has actually filed a patent.9 No native on when or if it will certainly be available, yet it looks prefer it may be the means of the future.

If clients and also patients prefer something less complex, Chow has damaged it down to a basic rule the thumb. "While the 3,500-calorie ascendancy has been challenged in the past, us were the an initial to replace it v an equally simple, but much more accurate rule, and also that is the "every 10 calories per day diminish in calorie intake leads to an ultimate one-pound loss," but it have the right to take three years to obtain there," Chow says. In various other words, load loss isn"t a linear event over time, as the 3,500-calorie rule suggests. Every one of this brand-new information shows that weight loss might be slow, also slower 보다 we thought. That makes patience a major factor in weight-loss success. And also because compliance wanes end time, consistency is the other significant part the the equation the adds up to successful weight loss.

"Successful weight administration is a long-term undertaking that calls for diligence each and every day," says Corby Martin, PhD, manager of the Ingestive actions Laboratory in ~ Pennington Biomedical research study Center. "It"s critical that patients and also dietitians repetitively monitor development and change their therapy strategy accordingly. If a patient"s present treatment regimen isn"t working, it"s imperative to recognize this as early on as possible and employ much more intensive strategies." Both Chow and also Hall think that taking active control the food consumption may be required to border the long-term rise in energy intake that commonly occurs, particularly in the challenge of the dramatic rise in availability and marketing of extremely palatable, convenient, inexpensive, and also energy-dense foods.7

And perhaps most intriguing is the new research intended to be released this year by Thomas and also colleagues. "We have actually a document under review around a means to make it straightforward for dietitians to identify, from short-term data, who"s likely to be successful at losing weight end the long term."

Counseling recommendations The 3,500-calorie-per-pound dominance is dead, or it have to be. In its place are brand-new online tools to help RDs far better predict just how much load clients and patients realistically can expect to lose over time. In addition, young name believes the brand-new mathematical formulas can inform dietitians once it"s time to reevaluate your clients" or patients" progression and assist them decide what reality adjustments are needed. If weight-loss landmarks haven"t to be reached, climate it may be time to reassess what the customer is or isn"t doing. Martin recommends weekly or biweekly check-ins come see exactly how clients space doing. More thorough evaluate of progress, he says, should happen every three to 6 months.

While the brand-new online tools most likely will predict lot slower development than anyone would certainly like, dietitians can use lock to assist clients and also patients set more realistic goals and also let them understand that progress more than likely will be slow and also unsteady. Furthermore, if they"ve to be reading around weight loss digital or in diet books, inform them that the thinking has changed dramatically and the 3,500 calories-per-pound preeminence no much longer applies.

— Densie Webb, PhD, RD, is a freelance writer, editor, and industry consultant based in Austin, Texas.

References 1. Thomas DM, boy name CK, Lettieri S, et al. Can a load loss of one lb a mainly be accomplished with a 3500-kcal deficit? comment on a frequently accepted rule. Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(12):1611-1613.

2. Guth E. JAMA patient page: healthy weight loss. JAMA. 2014;312(9):974.

3. Wishnofsky M. Caloric equivalents of acquired or lost weight. Am J Clin Nutr. 1958;6(5):542-546.

4. Hall KD, Sacks G, Chandramohan D, et al. Quantification the the impact of energy imbalance top top bodyweight. Lancet. 2011;378(9793):826-837.

5. Hall KD, Chow CC. Why is the 3500 kcal every pound load loss dominion wrong? Int J Obes (Lond). 2013;37(12):1614.

6. Cutting board DM, Bouchard C, Church T, et al. Why do individuals not lose more weight from an exercise intervention at a defined dose? An energy balance analysis. Obes Rev. 2012;13(10):835-847.

7. Chow CC, room KD. Short and long-term power intake patterns and also their effects for person body weight regulation. Physiol Behav. 2014;134:60-65.

See more: Boston Red Sox Truck Day 2021, 2021 Truck Day Presented By Jetblue

8. Room KD, Heymsfield SB, Kemnitz JW, Klein S, Schoeller DA, Speakman JR. Energy balance and also its components: ramifications for body weight regulation. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012;95(4):989-994.

9. Personalized dynamic feedback manage of human body weight: United claims patent application united state 20130198214 A1. Google Patents website. Http://www.google.com/patents/US20130198214. Accessed September 4, 2014.